Historical Studies

Historical Studies

Reassessing Philip II's Asian Minor Campaign: A Strategic Move Against Persia or Local Hegemony?

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
Gholamreza Askari 1
Kolsoum Ghazanfari 2
1 PhD candidate in ancient Iranian history, Department of History, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of History, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
10.30465/hcs.2025.49768.2971
Abstract
Abstract
Scholars still debate the aims and motives of Philip II's campaign against the Achaemenid Greek city-states in Asia Minor. Was this campaign a prelude to an attack on the Achaemenid Empire, or was it an extension of Philip's efforts to dominate Greece and Asia Minor? Scholars have paid less attention to this question, focusing instead on Philip's perspective, his desire for revenge against the Achaemenids, and his plans for invading the Achaemenid Empire. This article presents a new perspective on Philip's invasion of the Achaemenid Empire in Asia Minor. It examines sources and research that directly or indirectly address this issue. The article aims to analyze the Macedonian king's ultimate goal and purpose. Studies show that Philip's actions in Greece were a necessary prelude to his next steps and that conquering Asia Minor and acquiring its wealth were the king's real goals. Of course, his suspicious death thwarted these goals, and the Great King seems to have played a role in it.
Keywords: Achaemenids, Philip of Macedon, Asia Minor, Artaxerxes Ochus, Darius the Great
 
 
 
Introduction
Following the Peloponnesian Wars and the Peace of Antalcidas (which was concluded with Achaemenid support in favor of Sparta), the Achaemenid Empire under Artaxerxes II successfully consolidated its influence over Greek territories. However, internal satrapal revolts—particularly Cyrus the Younger's rebellion and the Battle of Cunaxa—weakened the empire's internal cohesion. Subsequent military campaigns, such as Agesilaus' invasion and the unrest caused by the dismissal of satraps' mercenaries (e.g., Artabazus' revolt), exposed structural weaknesses in Asia Minor. The Achaemenid kings' neglect of developments in Greece and Macedonia created an opportunity for Philip of Macedon's rise to power. After securing dominance over Greece, Philip turned his attention to the Greek city-states under Achaemenid rule in Asia Minor—an action whose motives remain debated among scholars.
According to classical Greek sources (e.g., Aeschines, Demosthenes, Isocrates, Diodorus Siculus), two main perspectives exist regarding Philip's objectives: The first views his campaign in Asia Minor as an extension of his policy to dominate Greece, interpreting it as part of Macedonian expansion. The second considers Philip's ultimate goal to be an invasion of the Achaemenid Empire, with Asia Minor serving as a stepping stone for a broader eastern campaign. These views are reflected in the works of Western and Iranian scholars, including Griffith, Errington, Borza, Anson, Worthington, Hammond, Gabriel, Briant, Dandamaev, Pirnia, Zarrinkub, Rajabi, and Imanpour.
This study re-examines these sources and analyzes existing perspectives to offer a fresh outlook on Philip II's objectives in attacking the Greek cities of Asia Minor. By focusing on historical, political, and military contexts, it aims to bridge gaps in understanding the early conflicts between Macedonia and the Achaemenid Empire and to clarify the circumstances leading to Alexander's campaign.
 
Materials & Methods
This study uses a descriptive-analytical method to explore Philip II of Macedon's motives for attacking Greek city-states in Asia Minor. It examines his strategic goals, including claims of "pan-Hellenic revenge" against Persia. The research assesses whether his campaigns aimed at regional expansion or a larger invasion. Ancient texts and modern historiography are analyzed thematically and chronologically (359-336 BCE). The study reconciles conflicting sources and addresses biases like hostile Athenian views. It clarifies the link between Philip’s campaigns and his imperial ambitions. The findings contribute to debates on Macedonian expansion before Alexander. Ultimately, the research offers a framework to understand Philip’s geopolitical strategies in Asia Minor.
 
Discussion & Result
In the late 4th century BCE, Macedonian expansion under Philip II significantly heightened tensions with the Achaemenid Empire. Philip aimed to control Thrace and the northern coast of the Aegean Sea, extending Macedonian influence into Asia Minor—territory previously under Achaemenid control. This expansion threatened the empire’s strategic interests, positioning Philip as the dominant power in the eastern Mediterranean and the undisputed ruler over Greece and the western parts of Asia Minor.
Despite offers of peace and alliance from Darius III to Philip’s general Parmenion, Philip rejected these overtures, motivated by his economic ambitions and military plans. This defiance provoked a strong response from Artaxerxes Ochus, the Achaemenid king, and his governors, who took military steps to curb Macedonian advances. Revolts erupted in regions such as Dascylium, led by governors like Artabazus who eventually fled to Athens. Philip sought to build alliances with local rulers such as Hermias and Pixodarus, but his efforts met mixed success, with some governors reaffirming loyalty to Artaxerxes.
Fearing Macedonian dominance, the Achaemenid Empire responded to Athens’ request for assistance against Philip, ordering governors in Asia Minor to resist his campaigns. These conflicts forced Philip to retreat, though he retained political control over key cities like Perinthus and Byzantium. Some scholars suggest a non-aggression pact may have been signed between Philip and Artaxerxes III before the Macedonian campaign, reflecting a tense but cautious power balance.
At the same time, the Achaemenid Empire was weakened by internal turmoil. The assassination of Ardashir Ochus, the brief reign of Arses, and Darius III’s rise to power coincided with widespread rebellions in Babylon, Egypt, and Asia Minor. This instability hampered the empire’s ability to effectively counter Philip’s advances.
Following the Council of Corinth in 338 BCE, Philip launched a campaign against Achaemenid territories in Asia Minor, sending an advance force under Parmenion and Attalus. The campaign sparked revolts among Greek cities there, many of which sided with Macedonia. Beyond military aims, Philip sought economic control of strategic Aegean islands to restrict the Achaemenid fleet’s operations.
However, as Darius III consolidated his power, Memnon, the Achaemenid governor, regained control over most lost cities except Abydos, which remained with Macedonia. In 334 BCE, Philip was assassinated by Pausanias at a wedding—an act some historians believe was orchestrated by Darius III to delay Macedonian aggression. Philip’s death triggered internal Macedonian conflicts and revolts among Greek city-states, setting the stage for Alexander’s later campaigns and illustrating the fragile power dynamics of the eastern Mediterranean in this era.
 
Conclusion
After securing power in Macedonia and subduing internal rivals, Philip II turned his attention to expanding his territory, first targeting Greek states like Athens and Sparta. His goal was to dominate Greece and solidify Macedonian hegemony. However, economic challenges—exacerbated by the high cost of military campaigns and the poor economic state of Greek cities—pushed Philip to seek resources beyond Greece. Recognizing that Greece alone could not sustain Macedonia's growing needs, he promoted a campaign against the Achaemenid Empire, using pan-Hellenic rhetoric as a pretext.
Philip cleverly gained the support of the Greek states through the Corinthian Council, framing his ambitions as a collective revenge against Persia. However, his true aim was the conquest of wealthy Greek cities in Asia Minor. These cities offered not only tribute and taxes but also increased Philip’s prestige among Greek states. The internal turmoil within the Achaemenid court, including weakened control over Asia Minor's satraps, further encouraged Philip’s expansionist plans.
Though he claimed to free the Greek cities from Persian rule, Philip’s actual motivation was their wealth. His campaign, however, was cut short by his sudden and suspicious assassination—a death that may have involved the Achaemenid king seeking to delay or stop Macedonian aggression.
Keywords
Achaemenids, Philip of Macedon, Asia Minor, Artaxerxes Ochus, Darius the Great

Subjects

Anson, E. M. (2008). "Philip II and Transformation of Macedonia: A Reappraisal". In T. Howe and J. Reames (eds.), Macedonian Legacies: Studies in Ancient Macedonian.
Anson, E. M. (2013). Alexander the Great: Themes and Issues. London and New York: Bloomsbury.
Arrian (1884) “The Anabasis of Alexander.” In The Complete Works of Arrian, Translated by A. Commentary, From the Greek of Arrian, London, Hodder and Stoughton
Badi, Amir Mehdi (1985), Greeks and Barbarians: The Other Side of History, translated by Ahmad Aram, Tehran: Parvaz.
Badian, Ernest (1996) “Alexander the Great between the two Thrones and Heaven: Variations on an Old Theme”. In; A. Small (ed.): Subject and Ruler: The Cult of the Ruling Power in Classical Antiquity.
Bengston, Herman (2009), Greeks and Persians, translated by Timur Ghaderi, Tehran: Mahtab.
Bernárdez, Borja Antela (2007). “Hegemonía y Panhelenismo: Conceptos Politicos en tiempos de Filipoy Alejandro”, Dialogues d'histoire ancienne 33/2.
Bloedow E. (2003). Why did Philip and Alexander Launch a War against the, Persian Empire? In: L'antiquité classique, Tome 72.
Borza, Eugene N. (1990). In the Shadow of Olympus: the Emergence of Macedon, Published by Princeton University Press.
Borza, Eugene N. (1999). Before Alexander Constructing Early Macedonia, Publication of the Association of Ancient Historians 6, and Rejina Bocks Claremont California.
Boyce, Mary (1996), History of Zoroastrianism, Vol. 2, translated by Homayoun Sanatizadeh, Tehran: Toos.
Briant, P. (2002). From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire. Translated by P. T. Daniels. Winona Lake, in: Eisenbruns.
Brosius, M. (2003). ‘Why Persia became the enemy of Macedon’. In W. Henkelman and A. Kuhrt (eds.), a Persian Perspective: Essays in Memory of Heleen Sancisi.
Briant, Pierre (1998), History of the Achaemenid Empire, Vol. 2, translated by Mehdi Samsar, Tehran: Zaryab.
Brunt, P. A. (1965). “The Aims of Alexander”. Greece & Rome, Second Series, Volume 12, Issue 2, Alexander the Great (Oct., 1965), 205-215.
Brusius, Maria (2002), The Achaemenid Empire, translated by Hayedeh Mashayek, Tehran: Mahi.
Buckler, John (1994). Philip II the Greeks and the King, Illinos Classical Studies 19.
Byrne, J.R. (2008), Iran and Greece, Cambridge History of Iran, Vol. 2: The Median and Achaemenid Periods, translated by Timur Ghaderi, Tehran: Mahtab.
Cawkwell, G. (1978). Philip of Macedon, Publisher Faber & Fabe, London.
Cawkwell, G. (2005). The Greek Wars: Failure of Persia, Oxford.
Chulev, Basil (2014). Ancient Macedonia - The Rise of Macedon, Macdonia Cosmopolitana.
Cook, John Manuel (2004), The Achaemenid Empire, translated by Morteza Saghebfar, Tehran: Ghoghnous.
Curtius Rufus, Quintius (1984). History of Alexander. Translated by John Yardley. London: Penguin.
Dandamiev, Mohammad, A. (2010), Political History of the Achaemenids, translated by Farid Javaher Kalam, Tehran: Farzan Rooz.
Dandamayev. M. A. (1986). ”Artabazus”. In: Encyclopaedia Iranica, available at: https:// iranicaonline.org/articles/artabazus-gk
Diodorus Siculus (2005), Iran and the Ancient East in the Historical Library, translated by Hamid Biks Shorkae and Esmaeil Sangari, Tehran, Jami.
Dyakonov, Vladimir Nikolaevich (1974), History of the Ancient World, Vol. 2, translated by Sadegh Ansari and others, Tehran: Andishe.
Dusinberre, Elspeth. R. (2013). Empire, authority, and autonomy in Achaemenid Anatolia, Cambridge university press.
Ellis, J. R. (1976). Philip II and Macedonian Imperialism. London: Thames and Hudson.
Encyclopaedia Britannica” Paeonia”
Errington, R. M. (1981). ‘Alexander the Philhellene & Persia’. In H. J. Dell (ed.), Studies in Honour of C. F. Edson, 139–43. Thessaloniki: Institute for Balkan Studies.
Errington, R.M. (1980). Reviewed Work: A History of Macedonia. Volume II. 550-336 B. C. by N.G.L. Hammond, G.T. Griffith, The Classical Review, New Series, Vol. 30, No. 1.
Esposito, Gabriele (2022). The Macedonian Army of Philip II and Alexander the Great, 359–323 BC. Pen & Sword Military, Britain.
Foster, Nicholas Ed. (2005). "The Persian policies of Alexander the Great: from 330-323 BC" LSU Master's Theses. 3315.
Fry, Richard Nelson (2017), Ancient History of Iran, translated by Masoud Rajabnia, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural.
Gabreil, Richard (2010). Philip II of Macedonia Published in the United States by Potomac Books, Inc.
Griffith, G.T. (1979). G. T. Griffith, the Reign of Philip the Second, in: N. G. L.
Hammond – G. T. Griffith (1979). a History of Macedonia, II, Oxford.
Hammond N.G.L. (1994). Philip of Macedon, London.
Hammond N.G.L. (1995). “Philip’s innovations in Macedonian Economy” Symbolae Osloenses 70.
Hammond, N.G.L.)1972). History of Macedonia, Vol. 1. London.
Herodotus (1989), Chronicles, translated by Vahid Mazandarani, Tehran: Donyayeh Kitab.
Heckel, W. (1992). The Marshals of Alexander’s Empire, London.
Heckel, W. (2006). Who is who in the Age of Alexander the Great? Malden, MA, and Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Hornblower, Simon. (2011). the Greek World 479 – 323 BC, Fourth Edition. New York, NY: Routledge.
Hunt, P. (2010). War, Peace, and Alliance in Demosthenes’ Athens. New York.
Hunt, Peter (2010). War, Peace, and Alliance in Demosthenes' Athens, Cambridge.
Imanpour, Mohammad Taghi (2014), "Political History of the Achaemenids", Comprehensive History of Iran, 2, Tehran, Center for the Great Islamic Encyclopedia.
Kholod, Maxim. M. (2018). The Macedonian Expeditionary Corps in Asia Minor (336–335 BC), journal Klio.
Kitto, H.M. Davy (2008), The Greeks, translated by Siamak Aqeli, Tehran: Mahi.
Kienast, Dietmar (1973). Philip II. Von Makedonien und das Reich der Achaimeniden, München, W. Fink.
Londy, Peter. (1994). “Ancient Macedonia”, An Australian Symposium, papers of the second International Congress of Macedonian Studies, The University of Melbourne.
Low, Polly (2018).” Panhellenism without Imperialism? Athens and the Greeks before and after Chaeronea”, Historia 67, the University of Manchester.
Lynette Gail, Mitchell (1994). The Greeks and their foreign friendships, 435-336 BC, Durham theses, Durham University.
Lecoq, Pierre (2018), Achaemenid Inscriptions, translated by Nazila Khalkhali, Tehran: Farzan Rooz.
McQueen E. I. (1995). Diodorus Siculus. The Reign of Philip II. The Greek and Macedonian Narrative from Book XVI. A Companion, Bristol.
Moloney. E.P. (2017). “The compromise of kings: Philip II and Macedonian peace” Peace and Reconciliation in the Classical World, London.
Moysey R.A. (1992). ‘Plutarch, Nepos and the Satrapal Revolt of 362/1 B.C.’, Historia 41.
Müller, Sabine (2013). “A History of Misunderstandings? Macedonian Politics and Persian Prototypes in Greek Polis-centred Perspective”, Mesopotamia in the Ancient World, Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium of the Melammu Project Held in Obergurgl, Austria, November.
Olbrycht, Marek Jan (2010). “Macedonia and Persia”. In book: A Companion to Ancient Macedonia.
Omsted, Albert T (1357), history of the Achaemenid Empire, translated by Mohammad Moghadam, Tehran: Amir Kabir.
Pirnia, Hassan (2013), History of Ancient Iran; From the Beginning to the Early Islamic Era, Tehran, Editor.
Parpas, Andreas P. (2013). Alexander the Greet the Dissolution of the Persian Naval Supremacy 334-331 B.C, Dubai.
Paspalas, S. (2006). ‘The Achaemenid Empire and the Northwestern Aegean’, Ancient West and East 5.
Polyaenus. (1994). Stratagems of War, Vols. 1 and 2. Chicago: Ares Publishers.
Roebuck, C. (1948). ‘The Settlements of Philip II with the Greek States in 338 B.C.’. Classical Philology.
Rop, Jeffrey (2017). “The Historical Context of the Reply to the Satraps Inscription” (IG IV 556) Journal of Ancient History.
Rajabi, Parviz (2002), the Lost Millennia: From Xerxes to the Collapse of the Achaemenids, 3, Tehran, Toos.
Sarakinski, Vojislav (2012), whither the winds blow: Philip is Persian Policies, or the lack thereof, Ziva Antika.
Sarıkaya, Sevgi (2023). The roles of Artabazus II and his family. Mersin University Publication of the Research Center of
Schachermeyr. F. (1973). Alexander der Grosse: Das Problem seiner Personlichkeit und seines Wirkens. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Schacter, D.L. (2001). The Seven Sins of Memory: how the mind forgets and remembers. Boston and New York.
Seager, Robin and Christopher Tuplin (1980). “The Freedom of the Greeks of Asia”, on the Origins of a Concept and the Creation of a Slogan Author(s): Source the Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol. 100, and Centennary Issue.
Seibert, J. (1998). ”Panhellenischer' Kreuzzug, Nationalkrieg, Rachefeldzug Oder Eroberungskrieg? - Überlegungen zu den Ursachen des Krieges gegen Persien", in W. Will (ed.), Alexander der Grosse. Eine Welteroberrung und ihr Hintergrund. Vorträge des Internationalen Bonner Alexanderkolloquium, Bonn.
Spawforth, A.J.S. (2007). ‘The Court of Alexander the Great between Europe and Asia’, in A.J.S. Spawforth (ed.), the Court and Court Society in Ancient Monarchies, Cambridge, (ed.), the Court and Court Society in Ancient Monarchies, Cambridge.
Stylianou, P.J. (1994). “The Pax Macedonia and the freedom of the Greeks of Asia”, Aeykqeia, Epeteris (Cyprus Research Centre) vol.20.
Tarn, William Woodthorpe (1948). Alexander the great. Published by Cambridge University Press.
Walbank, F.W. (1992). The Hellenistic World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wieshöfer, J. (1993). Das antike Persien von 550 v. Chr. bis 650 n. Chr Zurich: Artemis & Winkler.
Worthington, Ian (2014). By the Spear: Philip II, Alexander the Great, and the Rise and fall of the Macedonian Empire, Oxford.
Xenophon. Hellenika. (2009). the Landmark Xenophon’s Hellenika. Edited by Robert B. Strassler. Translated by John Marincola. New York: Pantheon Books.
Zarrinkoob, Abdolhossein (2009), History of the Iranian People: Iran before Islam, Conflict with Powers, Tehran, Amirkabir.
Zahrnt Michael (2009). “The Macedonian Background” in W. Heckel and L.A. Tritle (eds.), Alexander the Great. A New History Oxford.
Historical Studies
Volume 16, Issue 2 - Serial Number 32
Autumn and Winter 2025-2026
October 2025
Pages 181-210

  • Receive Date 23 August 2024
  • Revise Date 11 January 2025
  • Accept Date 25 January 2025